[Ducati] NDC: Don't pass at the Gap

jules jules at popmonkey.com
Tue Aug 1 13:07:03 EDT 2006


also sprach vduc on Tuesday, August 01, 2006 4:58 AM:
> The "cager" should have stopped out of decency or only to check how
> the guy was.  In the end the cager didn't cause the accident and
> wasn't really involved so legally in my opinion didn't need to stop,
> therefore wasn't fleeing the site of an accident.  The biker passed
> on a double yellow and proceeded to go off road.

the cager was at the very least a witness.  you can have no fault in an
accident but still be involved in it.  was the cager innocent?  of
course.  was he involved?  maybe a leo can answer that...  at the
scene...

but regardless of all that yes, my main point was that he should have
stopped out of human decency.  if it had been me driving I would have
stopped.  I'm amazed at the number of you that are of the "well the
harley guy deserved it, 'cause he's stupid" variety.  I'm sure non of
you have ever done anything stupid...

or is it that he was on a harley?  would it have been different if that
was a beautiful 74 bevelhead?  I'm betting someone here would have
stopped just to check on the bike :P

-- 
j u l e s @ p o p m o n k e y . c o m
http://www.popmonkey.com/jules




More information about the Ducati mailing list